Gun control has
been a hot topic, beginning in late 2012 and continuing to 2013. This has been
in part due to the awful displays of inhumanity carried out by lone gun men on
a mission to kill and maim. These
grotesque displays of violence must be stopped. However; America seems to be
focusing on the weapon used to perform these horrible actions and not the man
behind that weapon. Of course this weapon is a gun. Instead of shooting
straight with this issue politicians seem to be avoiding the underlying cause
of this debate by putting all the blame on the weapon. So the question now
becomes why. Why do these assassins seek to kill those in their own community’s
and sometimes even family’s, (in regards to the Newtown shooting)? What do
these slayers have in common that links their killing sprees? It’s not the
weapons they have chosen to wield but is something more on a human level: sanity. So now we get into the meat of the
issue these murderers Adam Lanza the Newtown shooter, Seung-Hui Cho the
Virginia Tech shooter and the Aurora theater shooter, James Holms all had one
thing in common. All three of these men
were mentally unstable. To think these
three tragedies could have been avoided if only the humans selling the weapons
had known the state-of-mind that their customers were in.
This area of the debate deserves our attention
because there is a real connection between mental illness and mass public
shootings. According to The
Washington Times “More than half of the killers in mass shootings over the past
century were beset by serious mental illness” (most often severe depression or
paranoid schizophrenia), a rate that's at least five times higher than that
estimated for the general population. These weapons are not toys and deserve to
be treated seriously; as we would treat any dangerous animal primed to kill. So
why then do we continue to allow those with mental illness to acquire such weapons?
Why are we blind to the fact that the young man that just bought an AK47 is
mentally unstable?
Gun control advocates have some
strong points in regards to stricter back ground checks such as in gun shows
and heaver penalty’s for those convicted of gun related crimes. Over the past
people purchasing weapons at gun shows have not been required to fill out back
ground checks. These purchases account for over 40 percent of guns bought in
America says Schevel Michael. When
asked his opinion about this situation Steve Mostyn trial-lawyer from Houston,
who is pro-gun, while also being in favor of universal background checks had
this to say, “I’m not anti-gun. I'm just not pro-dumbass.” However in the last
group of mass shootings back ground checks would have done nothing to stop the
rampaging gun men from acquiring weapons because they had no criminal history.
So yes universal back ground checks should be implemented but they are not the
only issue. America has seen the devastation that a mentally ill man and a gun
can reap so why not remove the guns from the people unfit to have them?
However this suggestion has sent one
group reeling and unfortunately it is this one group that disagrees with
psychiatric analyses and reporting on the status of the mentally ill are the
ones whose cooperation we need the most doctors. These medical professionals
claim that revealing such knowledge is a total breach of doctor patient
confidentiality (Robert
McCarthy). Not to mention the repercussions of reporting the status of the
mentally ill to the ATF. Julianne Carbin, executive director of the National
Alliance on Mental Illness Wisconsin, said that doing so might further alienate
those who need help and discourage people from seeking treatment. Kenneth P.
Houseknecht, executive director of the Erie County Mental Health Association
"We have to stop
associating violence with mental illness," however the world has proven
the connection between mental illness and violence despite the cries from those
who would put all the blame on the weapon. While these are both valid points we should be
looking at this on a human level and asking the question how many lives this
doctor patient trust is worth.
It is these doctors who have chosen this
career and who have the responsibility of caring for and teaching these people.
Not only doctor’s, but school teachers, counselors and parents also have a
responsibility to the mentally disabled, they are charged with. They have the
responsibility of taking care of those who cannot take care of themselves. However:
they also have an obligation to the community to report on the status of those
people when by neglecting that responsibility the person in there care may
become dangerous. This truth becomes
evident when we examine the Aurora Colorado shooting. Holms doctors knew of his
disability and saw his tendency towards violence, but said nothing. By doing
this the doctors claim they were preserving professional confidentiality. However; it could also be seen as a veil of
ignorance and by not reporting on these patients the doctors avoided that
responsibility all together. In the case of Virginia Tech there where even more
signs pointing to Cho’s instability and the approaching storm, for instance Cho
was detained and evaluated in 2005 and found to be a serious threat to himself
due to mental infirmity according to state officials.
Since Cho was never involuntarily
committed after the evaluation, he could not have been added to the database
listing the mentally ill and other groups barred from purchasing firearms. But
Cho does seem to fit ATF (Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms) guidelines for inclusion,
since a judge determined that he presented an, "Imminent danger to himself
as a result of mental illness." If Virginia lawmakers had con-formed their
standard to the federal law, then Cho's gun purchase would have been prohibited
(Sullivan, Will).
This case brings about a serious point, for example in most
mass murder cases there are warnings. It is our own blindness and the blindness
of some politicians that leave us defenseless. On that account new legislation
is desperately needed to combat this deadly blindness and disregard for
responsibility. Efforts should be made to pass legislation requiring a
psychiatric examination and in agreement with gun control policy back ground
checks. These should be administered everywhere guns are being sold. Also it
should be the doctor’s responsibility to relate any knowledge he may have of
his patient’s mental health so that the ATF can have that person on record. Mental
health professionals need to determine who should be allowed to purchase any
firearms even if this means a longer gun buying process and less
confidentiality. If this action helps
protect Americans and the 2nd amendment at the same time then it is an option
worth looking into.
To really
understand why we have these problems we have to discuss medical costs for
mental illness. These programs are very expensive and before 2008 they were not
generally covered, like most other treatments. According to the American
Psychological Association in 2010 congress passed the Wellstone Domenici Mental
Health Parity Act, this act allowed people struggling with disease or addiction
to seek help that was often covered. While this is a step in the right
direction the shootings of 2012 have proven it not to be enough. There are far
more people that are in need of this life saving help just over one third of
all mass shooters known to have mental illness have been treated we have to do
better (Grant Duwe The Washington times). However many Americans fear that by
diving deeper into the mental health dilemma their insurance prices will become
a crushing weight. This has put America in a tight spot with the tanking
economy and high prices for medical treatment. While many of these suggestions
should be implemented, there is a legitimate concern about higher insurance
prices.
There are thirty-thousand deaths due to
gun violence every year and about one million suicides each year; while this is
a major tragedy, if mental health became more of a priority both numbers could
be reduced. A majority of these suicides are due to mental illness and while
depression links to only a hand full of deaths, bipolar disorder, an illness in
which one-half of it relates back to depression, suicide rates is 15 times
higher than in the general healthy public Los Angeles Examiner. Also ranking as
one of the highest reasons for suicide is paranoia schizophrenia the disease
that both James Holms and Adam Lanza suffered from. This
is burning evidence that mental health legislation needs to be revisited. Now,
this debate becomes less about magazine capacity and assault weapons and more
about helping those in need while letting our rights remain intact.
While
America does seem to be going through some troubling times with mass public
shooting there is a cure. Cheaper health care for those with mental illness
honest doctors looking out for the good of the community and proper back ground
checks along with psychiatric analysis upon purchasing a gun. These measures
will stop not just criminals but those whose mental infirmities might cause
them to be a danger to themselves and others.